CIVIL SERVICE INFO

India's Stance on US Corn Imports: A Multifaceted Analysis Reasons for Resistance • Why India Stands Firm Against US Corn Imports - India’s resistance to importing corn from the United States is rooted in a blend of economic strategy, food policy, and political calculation. • Despite pressure from Washington, New Delhi continues to restrict American corn for several key reasons: Prioritizing Domestic Needs • Domestic Production and Surplus: India harvests enough corn to meet most national needs, making large-scale imports unnecessary except in temporary shortfalls. • As a major producer, domestic policy rightly gives precedence to Indian farmers. Rejection of GM Crops • No to Genetically Modified Crops: A defining pillar of India’s food policy is the rejection of GM crops for food and feed. Exclusion of GM Corn • With over 90% of American corn grown from GM seeds, such imports are automatically excluded, reflecting both biosafety concerns and public sentiment. Trade Barriers and Ta...

H-1B Visas and Indian Professionals A large percentage of H-1B visa holders in the US are Indian professionals, with about 71% of them coming from India. Remittances from these individuals are a major source of foreign inflow to India, with a significant portion coming specifically from America. Policy changes or restrictions in the US greatly impact Indian workers and India's economy, especially regarding remittance volumes. Data visualization and bullet points highlight multi-year trends and the scale of affected professionals. #### Impact of US Policy on Indian Tech Talent Recent US immigration policy changes, especially those from the Trump administration, could adversely affect Silicon Valley, small businesses, and innovation by restricting high-skilled Indian immigrants. Experts caution that stricter H-1B measures will hurt America's tech ecosystem, as Indian professionals form the backbone of many IT and startup ventures. The article also discusses how this may offer opp...

Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a mutual defense Agreement ### Key Details of the Agreement### - A mutual defense agreement has been established between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, stipulating that an attack on one nation constitutes an attack on both, mirroring the principles of NATO. - The agreement is designed to address potential external threats, particularly in the context of recent regional developments and escalating security concerns. - Analysts suggest that Saudi Arabia may gain access to Pakistan’s nuclear program and potentially be included under Pakistan’s nuclear defense umbrella. - The agreement reportedly encompasses provisions for military collaboration, economic assistance, and security assurances. ### Regional Impact### - The agreement signifies a strengthening of the strategic relationship between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, especially as both nations navigate evolving regional security challenges. - India has expressed concerns that this agreement could ...

TAX HEAVEN COUNTRIES AND INDIA About 60% of India's outward FDI in 2024-25 went to low-tax jurisdictions, commonly called "tax havens," such as Singapore, Mauritius, UAE, Netherlands, UK, and Switzerland. Key Insights - Nearly 56% of India's foreign direct investments in 2024-25 were routed through these tax havens, with the rest going to standard destinations or "other low-tax countries" as per RBI data[1]. - Indian companies use these jurisdictions strategically—not just for tax savings but to improve global presence, ease of operations, and investment structure flexibility. - accounted for the bulk of tax haven FDI destinations. - Investment through tax havens allows easier cross-border movement of funds and greater protection from regulatory risks and tariff wars. Expert Views and Rationale - Experts say outward FDI to tax havens is often a strategic choice, not just for evading taxes but for better efficiency, ease in fund movement, and lega...

GEN Z AND NEPAL Gen Z protests in Nepal forced democratic changes in September 2025, leading to the resignation of Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli, the dissolving of Parliament, and the appointment of an interim government tasked with organizing new elections by March 2026.    Why Did Gen Z Protest? - Many young Nepalis were frustrated by poor job opportunities, widespread corruption, and government inaction.  - The government’s ban on 26 social media platforms triggered sharp opposition, as youth relied on these for communication and activism.  - Unlike past protests, Gen Z’s movement was decentralized, mobilized via platforms like Instagram and Discord rather than established political parties.  How Were These Protests Different? - Gen Z activists rejected traditional party affiliations and focused on clear, short-term goals—such as removing the aging political leadership and demanding a technocratic interim government.  - The protests evolved ...

Nepal Crisis  Nepal is facing a severe political and democratic crisis after violent protests led mostly by Gen Z demonstrators. The unrest, triggered by a deadly crackdown that killed 19 protesters, escalated into mobs torching Parliament, the Supreme Court, politicians’ residences, and media offices, while also releasing prisoners. Prime Minister K.P. Oli’s resignation exposed widespread frustration with decades of instability, corruption, and failed governance since the 2005 Jan Andolan II movement that ended monarchy.   Nepal’s youth, disillusioned by unemployment, mass migration, reliance on remittances, and failed political leadership, now back new forces like the Rashtriya Swatantra Party and independent leaders such as Kathmandu Mayor Balendra Shah. However, some of these figures risk undermining democracy with extreme positions, such as advocating the dissolution of Parliament.   The crisis underscores the danger of violent nihilism replacing democratic...